Tag Archives: Woman

I Am Woman, Hear Me Roar

I fell in love with her courage, her sincerity, and her flaming self respect. And it’s these things I’d believe in, even if the whole world indulged in wild suspicions that she wasn’t all she should be. I love her and it is the beginning of everything.

~F. Scott Fitzgerald

Right, so – next week, The Great Gatsby comes out in theaters everywhere. Leo, darling Leo, BE STILL MY HEART. And along that vein, I figured: what better way to end this [gorgeous, sunny, breezy] Friday than with a little inspiration from the author himself, a little you-are-beautiful message, and perhaps just the right dose of What-Would-Emily A.-Say (trust me, I play this game way too often, and miss her weekly digests on this blog so much these days). Fitzgerald ‘s words kind of grabbed me this afternoon, and made me want to be the woman he spoke of. Courageous, self-respecting and sincere? Those are a few of the most beautiful things to see in another human soul. 

And so – here’s to all you ladies out there. Stay courageous, stay strong, stay beautiful in every way that you are.

And for gosh sake, have a wonderful weekend!

tumblr_mm8rvx1dmi1qbsq5ro1_500

feeling giddy and strong today – visiting the Museum site to see the progress and celebrate the gorgeous weather

In Which Educated, Empowered and Enlightened Twenty-Something Females Rank and Reevaluate the Disney Heros of Their Youth

 
 

Once Upon a Time there was a Buzzfeed article named, “The Disney Prince Hotness Ranking.” Due to the predictable wave of tweets, shares, and  viral what-have-you’s that occur after any piece of 90′s nostalgia hits the interwebs,  said article was easily tripped over by a young blogger named Denise. Seeing as it was Friday and she was feeling whimsical, Denise decided that she should email this article out to  every similarly aged female she knew (who would, you know, not judge her). The resulting hilarious and overly opinionated email interaction has been recreated below with added visuals for good measure. By all means, enjoy…

Denise:

Happy Friday! Read this  —> Buzzfeed has penned what I started in my head long, long ago.

Reactions?

First, let’s clear up the obvious – Dimitri from Anatasia blows these dudes away. Also, SHANG and John Smith should be higher on this list. The nameless princes from Snow White and Cinderella have no business on this ranking – especially ahead of anyone Mel Gibson voiced. Prince Eric is too high. He’s too prone to mind control to be in the big leagues, but that’s just one girl’s opinion.

Also, animals are not contenders. Yes, Joceline I am talking to you and your odd attraction to adult Simba that I know for a fact you’ve had since college.

Not a dude. Sorry, Joce.

Not a dude. Sorry, Joce.

Emily:

First of all, Denise, this is the DISNEY rankings, so just stop talking about Dimitri! If he were that great, he would have gotten himself a Disney deal, not some rando second-rate animation contract. Also, Dimitri had a questionable character and tried to basically sell Anastasia to further himself (rude) and he wasn’t the brightest crayon in the box to begin with. In the end, Anastasia totally defeats Rasputin anyways.

I agree that Shang should rank higher, because although he perpetuates chauvinist lyrics in “I’ll Make A Man Out Of You,” that song is EPIC and in the end he is secure enough in his own skin to be with a strong woman like Mulan, and to appreciate and respect her. HUGE points.

I love that Prince Naveen from the Princess and the Frog ranks high on this list. Yet another great example of a weak man that saw the light when a smart, driven woman came in his life, and he changed himself and worked diligently to be his best self with her.

Prince Eric is the PITS. THE PITS, I SAY. He was too dumb to figure out human Ursula wasn’t Ariel (hello, HOW CAN YOU MISS THAT SHE WAS A GINGER?) and was so vein that he had a statue made of himself. And he never considered becoming a mermaid for Ariel. Clearly, he’s selfish.

Flynn Rider (#4) is just a washed-up frat boy. Can we please just get rid of him and his disgusting hair flip ASAP?

The nameless Princes may remain in the rankings as evidence of weak early-era Disney character development, and as a warning of why pretty faces really only get you but so far in life.

I would argue that Simba has more admirable characteristics than all of these men, but we’ll save that for another day.

Most of them? dumb. as. rocks.

Finally! Thank you “Enchanted” – The perfect prince: not animated, beautiful luscious hair, and all about empowering women (we think, maybe….)

Denise:

In defense of Dimitri, I only have the following to say: 1) John Cusak’s voice 2) collared shirts w/ rolled-up sleeves (sigh) and  3) a Sean from Boy Meets World haircut.

Need I say more?

Also, let’s not forget that despite his con man history, Dimitri can save you during a violent rainstorm, soothe you during a nightmare, wear a tux (like, WEAR it well), dance, and sacrifice everything for your happiness. Yeah, so don’t turn up your nose at Fox Animation, Emily. Mickey Mouse can’t have a monopoly on fictional dreaminess.

I agree with your judgement on Shang, Flynn, and Prince Eric. I forgot about that statue. Man, what a d-bag thing to do…

Can anyone shine light as to why the Beast is so highly ranked in this article? I mean, he was a cute human, but that lasted all of about two minutes.

Not quite doing it for me.

Not quite doing it for me.

Better.

Better.

Lauren:

Seriously –  ranking the Beast that high based on his appearance as an animal – and actually deducting points for what he looked like when he was human?  Pretty sure he should have been ranked last, precisely because as a furry beast, it’s impossible to call him hot or sexy.  At least John Smith was human.

And Shang.  Oh Shang.  You are my favorite.  Absolute crime to have not ranked him #1.

Stephanie:

One, this is the best email chain I have ever gotten, and I saw this ranking yesterday! I love it!

I was disappointed that Dimitri was not on the list, because as we all know, he embodies masculinity so completely that he without a doubt has two y chromosomes (like our good friend the Hoff), and therefore he should beat out all disney princes.  But I think that Shang should have been at the top of the list too!

If I could have class discussion about these things I would have above a 4.0.

Disney wishes they had this swag.

Disney wishes they had this swag.

But what do the MEN have to say about this ranking of fictional characters, you ask? Well, we have some input from a former guest blogger:

Nick

Really?! I thought Aladdin and Eric would be in the top 3, but Captain Shang is waaaaaay too low.

We agree, Nick. We agree.

We agree, Nick. We agree.

So, if you are a man and you happen to be reading this, here are the basic take-away points from this pointless exercise:

  1. Have a personality.
  2. Don’t be an animal.
  3. Also, this:
Dealbreaker...

Deal-breaker.

You’re welcome, Internet.

Hilarious.

The answer to my prayers! Pens made specially “For Her”, courtesy of Bic.  The customer reviews are great.

Apparently designed to be super-slim for delicate lady hands. Finally, a pen that gets me.

Hands up where I can see them…

You Are a Modest Person With an Outstanding Character–Sung by No Boy Band, Ever

by Joceline

So I just made the one-hour drive to Richmond and “What Makes You Beautiful” by One Direction played three times on three different stations. I know, so Spring 2012, but usually I just switch stations when I hear it come on, so I’ve never really heard the lyrics. This time there wasn’t anything on the country station, so I got to hear the poetical musicality of this wildly insightful song.

Essentially, this guy is singing about his girl, who is super beautiful, obviously. But! She doesn’t know it, and it only makes her more beautiful. In fact, that is exactly what makes her beautiful. Also, he likes it when she flips her hair. (I just went through the lyrics again and those are really the only two things he says about her.)

Thanks for saying I’m pretty even though I don’t know I’m pretty which makes me pretty.  I do like your matchy outfits though, that’s pretty cute.

I’m being snarky on purpose, since I just hate this song, but I have definitely heard this sentiment before when talking about someone. “Oh, he’s so hot, but the best thing is, he doesn’t know it.”  “She’s much nicer than someone that pretty needs to be, it makes her even more attractive.” Once again, that’s taking pretty-on-the-inside and translating it into pretty-on-the-outside.  I’m glad this girl is being praised for not being conceited, but that’s a compliment enough without having to qualify it in units of beauty.

It would honestly be more accurate (and more flattering, probably) to say “You look good AND you managed to not be an asshole!”  I don’t know if that’s quite as catchy, though.  But if someone turns that into a hit single for the fall, you tell them you heard it here first.

If You Have to Say You’re So Low-Maintenance, The Truth Is…You’re Not

by Joceline

There are three types of girls: high-maintenance, low-maintenance, and those who say they’re low-maintenance, but are actually high-maintenance.

This post is not about being fussy or being laidback.  It’s about the third: the girl who likes to bring up the fact that she’s so chill, implying that being high-maintenance makes you an unrelatable b.  In my experience, it’s because we think guys like low-maintenance women.  So one tactic is to highlight how not high-maintenance you are.

These girls say things like:

- “You’re taking forever to get ready.  It took me five minutes.”
- “God, girls.  I hate constant drama.  So catty.”  Because making blanket statements about other girls isn’t catty.
- “I don’t like expensive things.”
- “I don’t mind when [significant other] talks to other chicks.  I’m not a jealous bitch.”
- “You’re drinking a vodka soda? I’d like a beer.”
- “Why are you so dressed up?  I’m just wearing a t-shirt.”
- “I never get manicures.”  …And? It’s not a personality trait.
- “I don’t even own a blowdryer.”

Note that these statements may all seem innocuous when you’re just reading them–I’m not saying there’s anything wrong with liking beer or t-shirts, or not owning a blowdryer (heck, I don’t, I just don’t think it’s something to brag about).  It’s the judging that rubs me the wrong way, or the quiet implication that: if you drink floofy drinks or get manicures, that makes you more demanding, therefore I am better.

What’s my point?  You will never catch someone who is truly low-maintenance say, “I am so mellow, did I mention I’m really casual, and I’m easygoing too?”  If they’re actually low-maintenance, they won’t be thinking about it, so they won’t brag about how much attention they don’t need.  Bottom line: if you’re high-maintenance, that’s fine.  If you’re low-maintenance, that’s great!  But if you’re putting other girls down because you think that guys like chill girls better, can it.

As for me, I’m definitely high-maintenance.  Less so financially or with material gifts, but emotionally?  I’ll say it myself, I’m pretty damn clingy in a relationship.  Full disclosure!  It’s only fair to everyone involved.  And the solution is not to change what level of attention to require–or to pretend you need less than you actually do.  We might think guys like chill girls, but really some guys like chill girls, and some guys like fussy ones.

Also, now that I’m done writing this post I realize that When Harry Met Sally did it better.

Harry: There are two kinds of women, high maintenance and low maintenance.
Sally: Which one am I?
Harry: You’re the worst kind. You’re high maintenance, but you think you’re low maintenance.
Sally: I don’t see that.
Harry: You don’t see that? “Waiter, I’ll begin with the house salad “but I don’t want the regular dressing. “I’ll have the balsamic vinegar and oil but on the side. “And then the salmon with the mustard sauce, “but I want the mustard sauce on the side.” “On the side” is a very big thing for you.
Sally: Well, I just want it the way I want it.

OWN it, Sally–”I just want it the way I want it.”  No need to pretend or bash anyone.

The Beauty Confusion

by Joceline

The other day on facebook Emily A posted this picture, from Roald Dahl’s The Witches oops, The Twits, thanks for the correction Pranay.

You know, it’s a nice way of thinking.  When I first read it, I thought it was sweet, and to some extent, true.  I certainly find happy people more approachable, and if that translates into me thinking they’re more attractive, well, blame it on the eye of the beholder or whatever.

But I take issue with this thought of “If you’re a good person, then it’ll make you prettier!”  I’m not sure I want to go around telling children, “Hey, think good thoughts and be nice, it’ll make people think your face is more symmetrical.  And then people will want to bang you.”

Damn, she’s so pretty–she must be REALLY NICE.

It bothers me because telling someone “Your efforts to be friendly/kind/interesting will make you beautiful” puts all of this unnecessary importance on beauty.  All roads don’t lead to beauty.  Being physically attractive is not some currency by which all other traits should be measured.  If you’re a great person, it means: you’re a great person–which is enough of an accomplishment that it shouldn’t have to translate into beauty to make it worth it.

The other reason conflating beauty and virtue is dangerous is that it sends the message that being ugly is the worst thing in the world, to be avoided at all costs.  Which is the wrong attitude to take about ugly.  Ugly doesn’t harm anyone.  I’d rather be ugly than malicious–because a pair of Spanx notwithstanding, I can’t really change the way I look.  (Actually I totally can, eye makeup is amazing, but I’m not going to show you that anytime soon).

I’m being tongue-in-cheek here, but what I mean is that: pretty or ugly, I’d really rather people be impressed with what I do, rather than what I look like.   And I’m worried that someone will arm themselves with a smile and a great attitude, thinking it makes them prettier, and then be crushed if someone does call them ugly, as though it were the worst insult in the world.   If someone were to say, “Well, she’s mehhhh in the face…but she has a great personality,” yeah, okay, I might be a little offended.  But the important part is that I’d have a great personality!  Which, in the end, should be worth so much more than an apology for being unpretty.

The Curse of the Creeper

by Joceline

Ah, the creeper.   Girls slap that title on guys who are trying too hard, seem too desperate, or otherwise just weird us out, and we waste no time in skewering him to our friends.  “He just gives me a vibe.”  “He asked me to dinner for tomorrow.“  “He has creepy facial hair.”  “He showed up at Trinity by himself after texting me, and tried to dance with me when HELLO, ladies’ night!”

Things that will land a guy on the creeper list:

- Over-texting
- Explicit texting too early or unencouraged
- Touching on the small of the back/too much physical contact in general
- Too many compliments/comments about our physical appearance (compliments are nice, but if he calls us beautiful repeatedly, he’s trying really hard)
- Making it too clear he’s stalked us on facebook beyond the trivial stuff that shows up on his news feed (we all do it but for the love of God don’t talk about it!)
- Staring
- Always asking/showing up to where you are

Talking to too many ladies at once might earn you a creeper title, unless you’re a baller like Randy here.

But honestly, the most important thing that determines whether a guy is in Camp Maybe or Camp Creepy: how attractive he is.

Yes, I know.  We’re not that shallow!  But maybe, sometimes, we are.  Think about it.  A lot of the guys we’ve labeled as creepers are just hitting on us because we’re out, they’re out, we’re all flirting, and maybe they’re awkward and think you can’t go wrong with telling a girl she’s pretty!  But now, think of that last guy you called creepy, but imagine if he were really hot and you had a crush on him.  Now, let’s put on the rose-colored glasses of “this guy is really hot” and take a look at that list again:

- Over-texting He’s so interested in how my day was!
- Explicit texting Oh heyyyy, glad someone took it there!
- Touching on the small of the back What a charmer!
- Too many compliments Compliments!
- The facebook stalking Good thing he went through all of my pictures too, or else it would make me a weirdo.
- Staring Ooh, eye contact!
- Showing up to where you are Yes, he’s here, now to casually ignore him until he comes and talks to me.

There’s even a Google+ ad about this–this chick initially thinks the poor guy is a creeper but they end up getting married!  Be careful who you label, you might have to hurt his feelings later.

See?  A lot of the time when I call a guy a creep, it actually means I’m not attracted to him.  Which is fine, but I’ll call it what it really is–being shallow.  And everyone’s allowed to not be attracted to someone.  But don’t label a poor guy who likes you as a creeper when you just don’t like him back.  Calling someone a “creeper” should mean that he makes you feel uncomfortable or unsafe, and should be a warning to your friends that this guy might be looking to take advantage of you or them.  Actually being creepy means doing things like:

- Keeping the drinks coming, even when he hasn’t asked if we want another one or if we still have one in our hand
- Touching/talking/texting/anything when we make it clear we don’t want him to
- And as a grad student, explicitly going out to pick up “undergrad chicks”.  A twenty-year-old and a twenty-eight-year-old can find love across the bar of the Virginian, but going out with the goal of hitting on exclusively younger girls is, well, creepy.

And guys, there is a female counterpart to this.  Girls call you creepy because we do have to be concerned that people might be out there to take advantage of us.  But you know what you do?  Call us Batshit Crazy.  And that’s a post for another day…

The Spanx Paradox

by Joceline

I love Spanx.  They’re like an extra-tight hug…for my thighs!  Sure, by the end of the night my liver and spleen have gotten a little too close together for their own liking, but a good pair of Spanx wrangles my bod into flirty dress-wearing, booty-shaking, liquid-consuming condition.  And yes, I’ve heard them compared to “modern-day corsets” and subjugation of women etc., but to me they’re just another one of those things we use for a little boost of confidence.  You know, like eyelash curlers and high heels and push-up bras.

Anyway, the other weekend I was wearing some trusty control-top hose, and it reminded me of something I think of as The Spanx Paradox.  Like I said, I think Spanx are great, but not so much when you see them on their own.  Plus, when they are…ahem…removed, they leave unsightly red marks that take half the night to fade.

Despite her come-hither pose...giant beige underpants are about as sexy as they sound.

Much preferred would be that matching set with lace and bows that cost me far too much for the amount of fabric they contain!  And that I never wear!  But why do I never wear them?

Oh, right.  I hate thongs and loathe wearing them all night.  Also, prancing about in miniscule underwear is much less taut and much more wobbly than doing the same in iron shapewear.  And therein lies the paradox.  Either you wear your party pants and are less likely to flirt madly with someone, meaning you take your cutely clad self home that night…or you don Spanx, dance like a crazy person to Carly Rae Jepsen’s “Call Me Maybe”, and entrap someone only for him to discover you’re in granny panties made out of Teflon.  THERE IS NO RIGHT ANSWER.

And to end, this scene from Bridget Jones’ Diary sums it up better than I can:

Somewhat Slightly Infuriated

Okay so I’m not one to take my politics to teh Internetz, but last week a chord was struck.

I *love* being a lady, so when other people try to tell me what that’s supposed to look like or mean – especially when those other people have no intention of ever experiencing the outcome of what they’re trying to push – well, that’s one of the things on my short list of things that piss me off. every. single. time  (other items on list: Twilight, gross chewing, Bally Total Fitness customer service). So last week, between this imbecile, this imbecile, and this Virginia malarky, I had a slight rage attack.  Ughhhhhhhh.

I won’t bring this to a large rant, but to wrap it up in one giant, over-simplified statement, I’d so prefer to have the Dems reaching into my wallet from time to time than to have the GOP reaching into my vagina.

And since laughter is the best medicine, an onion piece in response to this VA hogwash:
New Law Requires Women To Name Baby, Paint Nursery
And the delightful “REALLY!?” that snl did in response to all last week’s tom-foolery:
Really!?

(Did I mention that I work in a church basement and that the woman across the hall just very angrily slammed her door while I was watching that second clip? Sorry I’m not sorry for having a uterus. Womp.)

Frigging In Love With Myself

I’m still in a sort of Goshdammit-people-wake-the-eff-up-and-love -yourself mood from my plus-size post a couple weeks ago, so I figured for this week’s label I’d veil another call to honor thyself in an excuse to talk about my favorite subject: how awesome I am.  Let’s not beat around the bush – I think I’m pretty much the greatest thing since sliced bread.  When people inquire about my self-confidence, I usually say it’s high, but mostly just so I don’t come across like an obnoxiously self-worshiping, mirror-loving princess who salivates over herself on the regular.  Which, you know, I am.

No period costume or set of hair curlers can stop my vanity.

Just as guest poster Emily (another Emily…what’s with that?  Remind me to tell you about when I lived in NYC with two other Emilies.  There are billions of us.  Weird.  But I digress…) came to the blog to defend why being kind of a bitch isn’t a bad thing if done authentically and to appropriate ends, so shall I  share why sometimes an extra helping of vanity/self-celebration/ego is not a bad thing.  In fact, it’s straight up what America needs.  So read on, patriot!!!

Read on for an explanation of how what my sister and I are doing here is actually a public service.

Remember  when I said that having more good for yourself isn’t selfish, it’s actually good for everyone?  I really believe that; I truly think one of the best ways to give back to the good in the world is from your own stores, and that can be tough to scrape when there’s nothing there.  Think about it…flashing a smile to the greater good doesn’t feel like an act of love if it’s one you had to wrench onto your face in the first place.  It feels inauthentic and shitty; it’s not good vibes you just threw out there, it’s a lie that you mustered up just so you could say you did your good deed for the day.  But when you’ve got so much (joy/love/feeling of abundance/gratitude/acceptance/whatever) that you literally can’t keep it all to yourself – when you want others to have some of what you’re having – that’s when it feels right to give.  And believe me, just like you can tell when it’s genuine and when it isn’t, so can those on the receiving end.

When that abundance is of self-love and acceptance – and when it’s not just a face you put on for the world to admire your panache -you’re not standing for caring only about yourself, you’re standing for others as an affirmation that it’s okay for them to feel the same way.  I am thrilled to the gills when I see people full-on loving who they are because it’s a reminder to me that I have a right to feel the same way (and so does everyone else).  People who are authentically – and authentically is the key word – celebrating their talents, enjoying their beauty, sharing their accomplishments, and living their joy?  They’re givers, they’re the ones sharing from their stores because they’ve mastered the art of loving their own shiz enough to inspire the rest of us to do the same.  They’re not selfish or cocky, they’re fucking philanthropists for your soul, so don’t be hatin’.

Prettiest pony at the pretty pony party, totes obvi.

Digging myself more hasn’t made me a douche bag (or so I hope).  When I look at the things I’ve done and the relationships I have with people I care about, it’s easy to locate the time at which I really started celebrating myself and see how the rest has improved; I’m a better friend for loving who I am.  I’m a better sister and a better daughter, I do better work, I make bigger impacts, and being less focused on “what’s wrong with mememe” allows me to be more present to the people around me.  I have stores now where I used to have scarcity; giving others more attention than I give myself isn’t pulling teeth, it’s a pleasure.

In reading back, this all kind of sounds like I’m blowing a lot of smoke up my own ass, but I think that’s kind of the point.  I am unapologetically okay with – nay, proud of – how much I like myself.  Cultivating my joy and self-love has been my life’s work, so why shouldn’t I let it stand for something bigger and better than just me?  People harvest food on their own farms to feed others, why shouldn’t we be doing the same with our capacity to love, accept, and enjoy?  So harvest away my little love-farmers, we got hungry souls to feed!!

That's right, I just called you a "love-farmer" in the same sentence in which I discussed souls. Shit just got real.

That Darned Glass Ceiling…Or Not?

I recently attended a seminar for Women in Surgery, which was a very nice set of lunch meetings geared for young female med students/residents considering or already starting careers in surgery.  Events like this always end up making me more apprehensive about the future—I’m too far from a career or a family to have real perspective of what it will be like, so I briefly freak out.

Something that doesn’t help me calm down is the fact that I often feel as though I’ve failed before I’ve even begun.  Why?  Because in addition to having more family woes as a female physician, I also hear that I won’t make as much money as male doctors do.  So–not only will my children hate me for never being around, but I won’t even be able to support them as ably as I would were I a man?!

Depressing. Maybe I should try this, is my mustache convincing?

Well, the money part is true.  It’s impossible for a girl to go through life and not hear that she is destined to peer up at her male counterparts from beneath the glass ceiling. (That typed sentence sounds a little weird, if only because now I’m imagining looking up at dudes walking on glass floors.  But I digress.)  Anyway, this is obvious, I’m not breaking any ground by saying that on average in the U.S., women make less money than men.  You all know this.  Seventy-seven cents to every dollar.  Doctors aren’t the exception, either; this survey of over 8,000 doctors in New York shows a gap of almost $17,000, or 18%, in male-female starting salaries.  Starting salaries, i.e., similarly qualified doctors entering jobs out of the same class of residents.  And our keynote speaker at that seminar told me something I didn’t know—these figures come after the data for women taking maternity leave and switching to part-time have been pulled out of the equation.

She left us with another tidbit: a woman who graduated high school in 2006 (which is all five of us on this blog, as well as many of my medschool class), over the course of her lifetime will earn on average two million dollars less than her male classmates.  “Say it with me,” she scolded us over the microphone.  “I want my two million dollars back!”

But wait!  This isn’t a rant about gender inequality or being subjugated by The Man.  I’m not one for identity politics, and I’m not here to rail against sexism keeping me down.  In fact, the “glass ceiling” irks me partly because it’s supposed to inspire so much righteous outrage on our part.  Women…get…paid…less!  And we’re…expected…to…HAVE BABIES!  Outrage indeed.  And part of me does get indignant that I might get offered lower starting pay than a male resident coming out of the same program. It is unfair that women are more often expected to take on the greater parenting role than their husbands.  Dr. Michelle Au puts it beautifully when she says, “Male doctors have children too, don’t they?  So why is it, in families where the mother is a doctor, that she is made to feel like the one who has to strike the balance, the one with the elaborate juggling act, the one who has to make a choice?”

So what’s keeping me sane?  Why won’t I let this bother me (except when I’m wallowing, as we all do at times)?  To put it shortly, I simply don’t believe in statistics*.  (I also don’t believe in jinxes.  Get at me, Fate.)  I refuse to be penned in by data that say I’m doomed to divorce, or that my children will hate me.  And getting paid less than a man?  I don’t care about being paid less than that guy over there; I care about getting paid less than I, with my own unique capabilities and talents, deserve.

Here's to hoping, UVA SMD14!

Maybe I’m being idealistic.  After all, sexism exists and is a very real force in the lives of career-seeking women everywhere.  But I can’t help but think (now, while I’m not actually slogging through the job search and the salary negotiations) that it can only affect me as much as I allow it to.  And that is: not at all.

* Okay, I believe in statistics.  As in, I believe they exist.  And sometimes I even believe they’re accurate.  I just refuse to let them define my life.